Senator Dick Gordon
By: Dexter R. Matilla
WE waited. The Senate building was starting to empty of its employees save for the security guards. It was a good thing that there was a television set in the room where we waited to keep my friend from the Tourism department, the photographer, and I entertained. A show on ANC was discussing the Ateneo-La Salle rivalry, one of the topics I was planning on asking Senator Richard Gordon.
It was already time for the nightly news and then the voice of the man we were waiting for suddenly came on. “I’m available,” Senator Gordon said on television when asked if he intends to run in the 2010 elections. “What does that mean?” I asked myself. While Senators Jinggoy Estrada, Panfilo Lacson, Loren Legarda, Mar Roxas, and Manny Villar are being widely talked about as running for the position, the “turn-around kid” may just pull off a repeat of when he ran for the Senate. He came from nowhere to win.
The time we spent waiting was longer than the interview but for close to two hours, the outspoken Gordon gave his views on the state of Philippine sports, his ouster from Subic, Erap’s pardon, etc. One thing sure is you don’t have to prompt him. He just goes.
We exited the Senate building around 10:30 pm and it was only then when we realized that the interview was well worth the wait. As to his plans for the 2010 Presidential elections, Senator Gordon will keep us guessing until he gives a definite yes. His focus at the moment, he says, is his work with the Philippine National Red Cross and his duties in the Senate. So for now, let’s get to know a little bit more about the man named Dick.
Senator, you are definitely one of the most visible supporters of basketball. Why so?
I was a cheerleader since first year high school, became head cheerleader in fourth year high as well as in fourth year college. Being a cheerleader helped bring out my passion. Cheerleading brings out the animo or the spirit of a community like a school. So it started in the Ateneo. At that time we were just a little over a thousand students. The American Jesuits fostered tremendous community spirit because our professors would always go to the games. And we would be at the bleachers of Rizal Memorial and Araneta Coliseum.
In Rizal Memorial, it’s excruciatingly hot. The game allows you the kind of spirit the team needs. When you cheer for the team, it affects the team’s performance. And it shows the character of the school. Ateneo is known for its high spirit and pride. I’m also from UP so I think UP ought to have that kind of indoctrination. There’s a sense of community which eventually becomes a sense of country.
Do you remember a game that really started the Ateneo-La Salle rivalry?
It goes back beyond me. Goes back to the 30s. A lot of people make the mistake that it started just recently. You have the LaOs, Moro Lorenzo, Senator Manglapus, Fr. Ampil. Even in grade school when I was in Letran, I would go to the games. Today, we’ve become a very individualistic society.
What fuels a rivalry?
In the old days we wanted a uniform. We wanted to show leadership. The Blue Babble Battalion was the whole school. It always represented the whole university. And everyone had to know the cheers. Now people don’t even know the cheers. Kahit na talo na kami ng 35 points, kahit na sinasara na iyong ilaw sa stadium we would still cheer. So until now, even when the games are over, I stay behind. I visit the team.
Why do you think there is a rivalry?
It’s a contest among good schools. The Ateneo was here before the American Jesuits came. The Americans gave universal education. They brought the Irish-Americans, the New York Jesuits. They have good teams there. You know, America is a sports-minded country. Here, Ateneo was the premier school. Rizal, de la Costa, Manglapus went to Ateneo. But the La Sallites, the American Christian Brothers, figured they were the best school, too.
For a while it was the Ateneo and San Beda. Caloy Loyzaga was there and we had Literal, Mayoralgo, Ed Ocampo…
These were teams that carried a very high degree of spirit. Ateneo has always been the philosophical school, the well-rounded one. La Salle is known in terms of Engineering, LiaCom. We were always “ratchos de orum.” La Salle felt the same way. UP too. That’s how it starts. A contest of what seems to be very, very good schools. More like the Army Navy football teams. They started out as good schools competing academically and that carries over to the sporting field.
In the New York Times, you were described as being known for your sideline antics.
It’s not an antic. It happens to me even when I’m watching the NBA in New York. One time, a guy behind me was complaining why I was standing up. Well, he didn’t know where I’m coming from. It goes all the way back to my Ateneo days. I’m cheering. In a game, I’m very proud to be part of the school. If I feel the people around me are not cheering enough and the team needs us, I don’t appreciate it. They’re just there to watch the game. That’s not the way the game was invented.
We define ourselves by how we act so I encourage the people to cheer. Sometimes I talk to them when they’re not cheering hard enough. This is not about exhibition. This is about showing our character. We don’t boo. We cheer our loudest. Even if we lose, we applaud the winners as they pass by. We even have a prayer for that. It’s a very good tradition in sports, something I don’t want our people to lose. It’s important. It’s part of your character formation.
Your passion for sports does seem incomparable.
Even here in the Senate. Do I lose my temper? Yes. I’m a human being. If I feel you’re not giving a hundred percent… Same thing when I was in Tourism. They all know that. They know it’s not personal. You draw out the best in your people. I remember my first weeks in Tourism. The people were not used to me. I told them, by the time we finish our stint together, you’ll be the best department in the whole country and it was so for three years. Awarded by the Makati Business Club, no less.
There’s a way of doing things. It carries over to the Red Cross. We stay in a disaster area for 24 hours. I’m always the first to react, always the first to gather the forces right away. It’s the same way in cheerleading. Are we going to allow them to beat us? We were never beaten in cheering during our time. You could beat us by 50 points and we’d still be cheering. Dick Gordon always goes 10,000 percent. You cannot be mediocre you have to give it all.
Look, the session was over by 4pm and I’m still here. My people are still here. Same as in Subic. I had volunteers with me and they were all proud of themselves. And even if I get mad at them internally, getting mad means trying to get them to be the kind of people I expect them to be: professionals. I would always defend my department, I would always defend even people I don’t like when they are being chastised or attacked by somebody else. But when we are in the four corners of the office or in the building of Tourism, you have to act in accordance with the expectations of the department. Same thing with our country.
Let’s discuss the time when you were muscled out of Subic by former President Estrada.
When I was being taken out by Estrada, our people were with me. We sang, ‘The Impossible Dream.’ We sang religious songs; we were together. And the time I was there, when they didn’t yet understand who I was, they would hate me. But in the end, we were tight. It’s a classic case of going to a place and in the beginning you have to say, ‘You’re going to hate me now. But in the end, we’re all going to love one another.”
In the bleachers, I would say, if you’re not going to cheer, I don’t want you here. Is that dictatorial? I don’t think so. It’s a bleacher. You’re bleached into transforming yourself from a mere watcher into a participant, a stakeholder. We used to cry when we lost. We used to cry when we won. And even in everything I do, I learned to appreciate people more by giving it all.
By the way, Erap did not get me out of Subic. It was the court. I said, ‘go to the court.’ Well, they tried to beat our people up, but it didn’t work. So after the Supreme Court gave the orders, we walked out properly. We even cleaned up the place. I shook hands with my successor even if I didn’t like him that much.
What did you learn from it that to this day you’re still able to apply?
The bitter truth that no matter how good you are, no matter how much dedication and effort you put in, and how much people see the good of what you’ve done, when the chips are down, you’re all alone by yourself with only your own people to keep you company. It happened to me twice. First, I was fired by Cory during the purging of Martial Law right after EDSA. Next, we were fired by Erap. We stood our ground. Can you imagine if I just keeled over and died?
Erap would have removed a lot of other people he didn’t like. But that’s not the point. I’ve forgiven Erap for that, I’ve forgotten that. What I can’t, and its not a personal thing with me…my problem is…what did we gain from all that?
Erap was recently pardoned by President Macapagal-Arroyo.
If I reacted to that strongly, it’s not because of Subic. But the point is, you have to have the rule of law. After six years, for the first time a president was convicted. Everybody had been complaining that the big fishes are never caught, finally, we had one. But, because President Arroyo was also in trouble, she pardoned him. I would have done it differently. I would have put him in jail, out him in Santa Rosa, Laguna, put him in Crame, separate cell of course. But not in his house in Tanay. Because that’s not a jail. Allowed him visitation privileges but everybody would know that he’s in jail. Then maybe after a year, after he says sorry to the people, I would have pardoned him.
Do you think it takes away anything from Erap?
Oh definitely. Because Erap said he wasn’t going to accept the pardon. That’s a lot of double-talk, I’m not taking away anything from GMA. She can pardon anyone she wants. But again, you have to use it with justice and mercy. Both of them as I said disgraced their office. Na-diminish silang lahat. I know I shouldn’t be saying that especially since people think I’m going to run for president but that’s the way I am. You ask me am I running? I said I’m available. Am I campaigning? I’m making contacts but my focus is the Senate and the Red Cross.
You are widely regarded as the “father of volunteerism.” Do you think that’s enough to get you to sit in Malacañang?
You’re a conglomeration of everything you’ve done. You should be judged for that. I’m a governor of the International Red Cross. I’m a senator. But all my life, I’ve been in the Red Cross. What does that tell you? I think these are the important things that people should remember. Are you constantly a leader? Are you constantly sincere? When you say Erap para sa mahirap, who did he help na mahirap?
Are we easily swayed by the theatrics?
The theatrics are because the media is perhaps handled by the powerful. I’m not always likeable because I have to be. Not because I want to be. Who wants to be unlikeable? But when you have a job to do, and you say, ‘God this country needs tourism.’ It’s the only way we can make our country move because we have no agriculture. We’re very, very weak. Our manufacturing is being taken over by China. Can you blame me if I say, ‘Hey, we’ve got to be better even if it hurts some people?’
How would you assess Philippine sports right now compared to how it was during your time?
I think it’s gone sour. I know there are people who are really trying hard and I respect that. But you know you’re not going to get sports moving unless the soul of the players is there. More and more it has become a very almost mercenary type of situation.
In Ateneo, we pay our own way. Our uniform was paid by the school but if you wanted something extra, you pay for your stuff. I played for the Ateneo in the track team and we won the championship but al of us participated. I didn’t win a medal but I was told by the coach, to be the rabbit—I did run the distance—to block the guy from La Salle and we won.
Sports today is not that good a program. We used to be the baseball power in Asia in the 50s. Baseball was Lavel, Olongapo and Teves, so we had a baseball tradition. But like our country, and like our politics, it’s gone down to mediocrity.
I watch the baseball games and I know Chito Loyzaga is trying very hard to revive it and I’m going to support him. You know in the major leagues in the US, when they hit the ball and it’s scuffed, they don’t use it anymore. Here, you pick up a ball, it’s dirty you just wipe it, and you use it again. What does that tell you? ‘Pwede na yan!’ That’s why I think we need good role models and coaches. I think there is an improvement in basketball but there should also be an improvement elsewhere. The government has got to put in money to sports because that’s part of nation building. In our country, you need to pay attention to the players. And…support and develop school spirit where they start their careers. We should develop the kind of tradition that extols maximum effort at all times, whether in sports or nation building.
#